A few months ago, I cited research that tested even in double blind controlled trials, the efficacy of prayer in healing patients. The results were mixed, but more importantly, I questioned whether it was theologically sensible and halakhicly permissible to conduct such trials, and, as a consequence of a negative answer to both these questions, whether such a scientific confirmation of the efficacy of prayer was even possible, in this premessianic age.
Today I stumbled across an article discussing interesting research:
“The researchers leading the studies applied clinical scientific methodologies to the study of intercessory prayer, but Cadge found that even that approach was fraught with problems. For example, researchers asked whether the people not being prayed for by the intercessors were truly a control group, since their family members were probably praying for them. Researchers also asked what the right “dosage” of prayer would be, how prayers should be offered, and what to do about non-Christian intercessors.
With double blind clinical trials, scientists tried their best to study something that may be beyond their best tools,” said Cadge, “and reflects more about them and their assumptions than about whether prayer ‘works.'”
Reflecting a recent shift toward delegitimizing studies of intercessory prayer, recent commentators in the medical literature concluded: “We do not need science to validate our spiritual beliefs, as we would never use faith to validate our scientific data.” Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by Arie Folger
Die rechtschaffenen Frauen in Ägypten

